[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?

To: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
From: [email protected] (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 14:18:17 CDT
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Timothy C. May" at Jul 28, 94 10:23 am
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Back in 1986-7 there was a major effort to have DES replaced with a
> new encryption standard. I don't recall the name for the program, but
> it had the support of several chip companies (Intel, AMD, etc.) and
> was, I seem to recall, mentioned prominently in the National Computer
> Security Act of 1987.

I think Tim's thinking of the Commercial Comsec Endorsement Program (CCEP),
an effort to get NSA-approved crypto hardware out into the commercial
world. For some reason it never really caught on :)

- -Paul

- -- 
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG      | "Information is the currency of democracy."
[email protected]           |     - some old guy named Thomas Jefferson
	       Of course I don't speak for Intergraph.
	       

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAgUBLjgEaafb4pLe9tolAQFWkwQAqmH/yf20V6w8gyLW1B18XDA+9ZakEHEt
GxUmze9xhjm/NZuPalCvHcj+QEf8OHUpnZD4I9BfGj47fskj1yM20dH7xUuzqLy+
SJJsISvOoM5dd3SxbetblZYHwcG9pnAt9kS73InS2osiPNNiWnt0SoByH9E32+Gg
xMXwsylpAaw=
=Fa/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
  - From: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)

Prev by Date: Re: Government-Controlled Trust Hierarchies
Next by Date: Dallas Morning News article?
Prev by thread: Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
Next by thread: Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread