[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EFF on why they did it.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] +1-510-484-6204 <[email protected]> wrote:
>David Lesher writes:
>> No money, not wiretaps. That may {or may not} limit the effect of FBI
>> Wiretap, depending on how [much/little] the Hill loosens the
>> pursestrings.
>
>It's certainly a good start, but the government *does* have other money.
Indeed. I'd really like to see the wording about how they actually need
to be paid for: namely, will allowing tariffs to be raised by RBOCs
count as "paying for it"?
They could spend the money by doing two things:
- Mandating the money be spent (the DT bill)
- and then allowing the RBOCs to increase their tariffs.
Presto! We've paid for the mechanisms, but not through the federal
budgets. The RBOCs have been pushing for high bandwidth R&D increases
of their general tariffs for a really long time, so I could certainly
see them playing along as long as there's room for other R&D in there.
Just a thought...
--
L. Todd Masco | "Cowboy politicians sucking up to the aristocracy, not
[email protected] | even sure if they like democracy..." - TR-I