[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Untitled
In article <[email protected]>,
Douglas R. Floyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I most likely will get toasted for this, but here goes:
Naw...
>I seriously wonder who is trying to create a repressive government. Clinton
>cannot pass a simple crime bill, much less become Big Brother.
Oh? Just wait and see... Now it just has to get past a Republican
point of order (it breaks the Budget Act) that requires 60%. Once
past that, it's home-free.
Even if he can't pass the Crime Bill (which I think is one of the most
frightening pieces of legislation in a long time: 2nd Amendment right
to violent revolution aside, it includes a measure which requires
anybody *accused* of a "sex crime" to be tested for HIV, at the
alleged victim's demand), think of it as a sort of "Pascal's Wager."
I'd far rather be wrong about this country getting dangerously
oppresive than be wrong about it being just fine, business as usual.
YM, of course, MV.
--
L. Todd Masco | "Large prime numbers imply arrest." - Previously meaningless
[email protected] | grammatically correct sentence. Now...