[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On the crime bill and remailers



At  5:38 PM 9/19/94 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:

>Some lawyer, can't do stat. intrepretation to save his/her life.
>
>As I pointed out before, the requirement for INVESTIGATION is reasonably
>appearing to have intent.  The statuatory offense itself includes NO
>REFERENCE to intent.
>
>The scienter requirement here is "gloss on the surface" of the kind
>intended to win votes from on the fencers.

Ah. I see. Then this stuff on my face is egg, no?

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga


-----------------
Robert Hettinga  ([email protected]) "There is no difference between someone
Shipwright Development Corporation     who eats too little and sees Heaven and
44 Farquhar Street                       someone who drinks too much and sees
Boston, MA 02331 USA                       snakes." -- Bertrand Russell
(617) 323-7923