Re: White Knight Remailers

[Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>]

| Adam Shostack writes:
| [oddly, I never received the original copy of this; I seem to be missing
| list messages with increasing frequency recently :(  ]
| > Real remailers (with return address features) should probably
| > be advertised in alt.support.* and alt.recovery, in order to build a
| > class of "good" users for them. [...]

When I wrote this, I did not mean to claim that remailers w/o return
addresses are not real.  I meant to say that remailers that rely on
operator screning & approval of messages are not what I consider real
remailers.

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
						       -Hume