[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)
From: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 16:31:45 -0800
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]

   From: [email protected]

   I agree with Tim that effortless encryption/signing of email is still a
   dream for most of us.  I don't think there should be any "punishment" for
   not signing (not even having the non-signer's mail delayed).  

Delay seems to be now third on the list of potential server actions.
First and second are adding header lines and sending back exhortations
and pointers.  It may be that we never need to add delay.  I'm not
stuck to the idea and am content to see what actually happens.

Eric

References:
- Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?
Next by Date: Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)
Prev by thread: Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)
Next by thread: Re: We are ALL guests (except Eric)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread