Re: Cypherpunks@hks.net service

[dmandl@bear.com]

> From: cactus@bb.hks.net
> 
> The cypherpunks@hks.net service is now available.
> 
> It will sign any message sent to cypherpunks@hks.net with its (currently
> 384 bit) key and forward the signed message to cypherpunks@toad.com.

No offense, but what's the point?  What's next, automated key-signing
services?  Is this just intended to help people who can't sign easily
to get around Eric's proposed requirement?  If so, it seems like almost
an embarrassment--someone setting up a meaningless message signer to
spoof the cypherpunk server, which it does easily.  Doesn't sound too
good to me.

   --Dave.