[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [email protected] service



> From: [email protected]
> 
> The [email protected] service is now available.
> 
> It will sign any message sent to [email protected] with its (currently
> 384 bit) key and forward the signed message to [email protected].

No offense, but what's the point?  What's next, automated key-signing
services?  Is this just intended to help people who can't sign easily
to get around Eric's proposed requirement?  If so, it seems like almost
an embarrassment--someone setting up a meaningless message signer to
spoof the cypherpunk server, which it does easily.  Doesn't sound too
good to me.

   --Dave.