[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
future entrapment
>From: [email protected]
>Date: Sun, 4 Dec 1994 09:26:11 -0500
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected]
>Subject: future entrapment
>
>Something to think about...(fwd)
>
>Thought you all might be interested in this excerpt from CPSR list regarding
>copyrights on the Net and especially how police can use the Web to set up
>stings.
>
>mp
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 07:45:31 -0800
>From: Charlie Stross <[email protected]> (by way of [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>
>Philosophically, I see most journalists as being filters. Some of us
>read press releases, strip out the propaganda, and supply the results
>(with interpretation) to the public. Some of us go and try to nail
>down the story by poking around and asking questions. But ultimately
>we rely on sensory input at some level -- and all we do is rearrange
>it, comment on it (by referring to prior input), and punt it out again
>at our readers. This is fundamentally an editorial process, and there
>will be more need for it -- not less -- as the information deluge
>gathers momentum.
>
>There's a huge problem on the net: how does copyright apply to a reference?
>For example: I can't stitch a Far Side cartoon into my WWW home page. But
>I _can_ embed an <IMG SRC= ...> directive in my page, pointing to a Far
>Side cartoon that is _legitimately_ stored somewhere else on the net. When
>you look at my page you will see the cartoon ... and will have a bit of a
>headache when you stop to think about the copyright implications.
>
>The precise question of what constitutes a copyright violation runs
>into a wall of mud as soon as you start asking questions about sources
>and hyperlinks. For example, here's the kind of havoc you can wreak by
>classifying all embedded link dereferences as deliberate actions.
>Suppose I am a cop in some redneck area, and I want to nail someone
>who uses the net locally. I could run a _very_ neat entrapment sting
>to nail people for posession of kiddie porn:
>
>* establish a local WWW server hosting some useful information
>* configure the server to record the IP addresses of people who
> access it, and cross-reference them to obtain geographical
> locations as registered with NIC. Feed this into a GIS and
> track local accesses.
>* have a list of people who I want to nail.
>* filter all HTTP requests through a script that
> - checks the list of victims
> - if a request for a file comes in from one of the
> targets, munge the outgoing web page to include
> a <IMG SRC= ...> tag pointing to a foreign site
> carrying images deemed pornographic in my jurisdiction
> - ring the console bell
>
>As soon as someone on the hit list downloads a file, you have prima
>facie evidence that they are probably in posession of some kiddie porn.
>Instant search warrant time ...
>
>(And in case you were wondering, this is just a technology twist on top
>of the recent Adult Action BBS case in Mississippi.)
>
>Basically, as far as I can see, conventional notions of copyright are
>going to have to change -- because copying is no longer the only mechanism
>for gaining posession of information. Our notions of intellectual property
>may also have to change ...
>
>
>-- Charlie
>
>(Who happens to write a column in Online World, and who can be found
>most months in Computer Shopper and some months in PC PLUS -- all three
>of them UK-based magazines unrelated to any US titles of the same name.)
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>++M++++I++++C++++H++++A++++E++++L++++++P+++++E+++++A+++++R+++++C+++++E++++
>| [email protected] | Knowledge for the pupil -er- people. |
>| [email protected] | Give them a light and they'll |
>| "annoying Xists since 1966" | follow it anywhere! -- Firesign |
>+++Y+O+U'D++P+A+Y++T+O++K+N+O+W++W+H+A+T++Y+O+U++R+E+A+L+L+Y++T+H+I+N+K+++
>
>
>
| "Encryption ROT13s your mind." | [email protected] |
|"Would you rather be tortured by the government | Disclaimer: |
|forces or the people's liberation army?" -mklprc | Ignore the man |
| -- PGP 2.6.2 key available on request -- | behind the keyboard.|