Re: GUCAPI (Grand Unified Crypto API)

["L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Derek Atkins writes:
 > Why do all this?  There already exists a Generic Security System API,
 > GSSAPI, which is an Internet standard (or there is at least an Internet
 > Draft -- I'm not sure what the current status is right now, and given
 > that the IETF is going on this week, it's status may change).

Ah, I knew of the GSSAPI's existence but hadn't realized that its scope
included what I wanted.  I'll read the draft on the internic and see
if it does what I want.  If so, the next logical step is to wrap RSAREF
in it and to make a PGPish-wraparound.

I'd certainly be up to the former;  Would anybody else be interested in
ponying up their time and effort for the PGP instance?  (The draft
is ftpable from ftp.internic.net,
/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-00.txt)
- --
Todd Masco     | "'When _I_ use a word,' Humpty-Dumpty said, in a rather
cactus@hks.net |  scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean -
cactus@bb.com  |  neither more nor less.'"   - Lewis Carroll
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLuT4LCoZzwIn1bdtAQHh9wF/TyMkm4Cd0gFzk26mdufgytY6NnHfiT3C
heS9ACR9d8jwS2pu8/wvF84+sQs0nTEc
=bY6Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----