[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Misunderstanding of Remail Headers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[email protected] (Jonathan Rochkind) writes:
>quoted from the Globe & Mail appearantly didn't even understand the
>disclaimer. The article was worded in such a way to make it seem the
>disclaimer was saying that Bob Rae didn't really write the message, as
>opposed to saying that Hal Finney didn't really write the message!
>Something needs to be done so that even the most internet clueless will
>understand that the message _isn't_ from Finney or McCarthy or Joe Random
>RemailerOp, which appearantly isn't clear to many people currently.
There was some discussion here last week about remailers which don't let
users put in "From:" lines. This case shows a good reason not to allow
them. "Reply-To:" should be used to force a reply to some anonymous return
address if you have one. So perhaps filtering "From:" is a good idea.
Hal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQBVAwUBLuy1ChnMLJtOy9MBAQHYNAH9EDJe3vzIV1DI/7IoZ7q+8eQZCSCMZ6GT
+5onVqzTyvm02ijSQLsqLg8WohnZCKTlt9bK/JCh63idT+Bc3KoRPg==
=K+kq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----