[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: San Francisco Editorial

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: San Francisco Editorial
From: Dave Horsfall <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 16:10:27 +1100 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Tue, 3 Jan 1995, Michael Handler wrote:

> 	Dick Depew and AARM (Auto-Active Retro Moderation). He wanted to 
> cancelbot any posting from anon.penet.fi in the Big Seven Usenet hierarchies.
> He was promptly beaten down by the net. Feh.

He was also the one who presented a convincing argument that the one
who posted the alleged transcript was none other than Julf himself; he
(Dick) was getting responses from the perpetrator faster than the
delayed-response mechanism would have allowed...

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) | [email protected] | VK2KFU @ VK2AAB.NSW.AUS.OC | PGP 2.6
Opinions expressed are mine. | E7 FE 97 88 E5 02 3C AE  9C 8C 54 5B 9A D4 A0 CD

References:
- Re: San Francisco Editorial
  - From: Michael Handler <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: EVEN MORE creis for regulation
Next by Date: Re: Book review: Codebreakers, the Inside Story of Bletchley Park
Prev by thread: Re: San Francisco Editorial
Next by thread: Re: San Francisco Editorial
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread