Re: Clinton freezes U.S. assets of Mideast groups

[sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)]

...
> > Windows NT is supposedly secure.  Certainly its design makes
> > it possible to write software that is intrinsicly secure,
> 
> Why do you think that? Certainly it's compartmentalism
> is better than UNIX, and as a "ground-up" design it's
> probably seen better QA than UNIX. However, it hasn't had
> 20 years of interest from hackers and others. Also, while
> the NT kernel may be *better*, several subsystems have
> all the problems of UNIX, e.g. TCP/IP and the sequence
> number attack.
> 
> I like NT, but it will never be a security panacea.
> 
> --
> Richard Parratt

IMHO:

When are people going to realize that Windows NT is just a partial,
microkernel (?right), enhanced scheduler Unix?  Add the other
half with NutCracker or Consensys's product (what's it called?),
and you have have a Posix (not just shell) and Unix SysVR4.2
compatible environment (Supposedly).

Unless they make too many mistakes of not staying simple with
core concepts or not implementing enough basic building blocks,
I can hopefully treat it as just another Unix platform.

<Obviously still irritated that companies think (or know...) that
they can eek out more money by reinventing instead of refurbishing
or augmenting something flexible enough to do anything they want.
Face it: there is nothing I can't add to a Unix system, and it wouldn't
have to affect existing programs one bit.>

sdw
-- 
Stephen D. Williams    25Feb1965 VW,OH      sdw@lig.net http://www.lig.net/sdw
Senior Consultant    513-865-9599 FAX/LIG   513.496.5223 OH Page BA Aug94-Feb95
OO R&D AI:NN/ES crypto     By Buggy: 2464 Rosina Dr., Miamisburg, OH 45342-6430
Firewalls/WWW servers ICBM: 39 38 34N 84 17 12W home, 37 58 41N 122 01 48W work
Pres.: Concinnous Consulting,Inc.;SDW Systems;Local Internet Gateway Co.17Jan95