Re: CERT statement

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>]

Thomas Grant Edwards says:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> > Kerberos per se isn't sufficient to defend against session hijacking
> > attacks, you know. The situation in question is really insidious and
> > requires packet-by-packet cryptographic authentication.
> 
> Do you really need to authenticate every packet?  Isn't it enough to 
> authenticate the party and perform a secure key exchange, then depend on 
> the encryption (+ message authentication code for block ciphers) ?

If things are merely encrypted, an attacker can garble them without
being caught -- I can "decrypt" random numbers into other random
numbers if I want.  Think of an attacker trying to sabotage the
transfer of a binary file and you'll see why you need authentication.

Perry