[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device

To: Charles Bell <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 21:06:58 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Jan 1995 17:53:33 PST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Charles Bell says:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > The manufacturers of switching equipment are supposed to make it easy
> > to get at individual conversations. Nothing in the act forces
> > customers to make the contents of the conversations comprehensable.
>
> That's a loophole in the law that Congress can plug in a day.  And one of 
> these days you can bet they will.
> 
> What then?

Then the law will be different. The question was one of what the law
is now.

Perry

References:
- Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
  - From: Charles Bell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
Next by Date: CD-ROM [brief addition]
Prev by thread: Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
Next by thread: NYT on Fermat Proof
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread