Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995 (fwd)

[shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199507132116.VAA149322@smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net>,
jfmesq@ibm.net (James F. Marshall) wrote:

> I haven't read the whole
>bill, but I read the "regardless" phrase with a different emphasis. 
>In short, that language appears to mean that one could be pounded with
>RICO for uploading crypto software even if the crypto is EXPORTABLE.

The government doesn't want us to use any crypto that takes them an
appreciable ammount of time to crack. It seems inevitable to me that such
crypto will soon be outlawed. The same goes for anonymous remailers. It is
only a matter of (very little) time. Yes, Black Unicorn is right. We need
stealth encryption. Unfortunately even that won't help as much as one
might think, because it can only be used by tight conspirators who are
willing the to take the risk to be locked up in a concentration camp, I
mean jail, for the rest of their lives. Crypto for the masses is about to
fade away into history, before it ever really caught on.

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMAWlEyoZzwIn1bdtAQFIYwF+JKboVVw7qm+Ejyj0ecTp1EbqWL2YCAlb
tL3RLDWA5VLcKakMh2nI3oZns0SLknGw
=+fvE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----