[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel)
From: Phil Fraering <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 17:43:54 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Ray Cromwell's message of Fri, 4 Aug 1995 17:52:24 -0400 (EDT) <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

   From: Ray Cromwell <[email protected]>
   Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 17:52:24 -0400 (EDT)

     SafeTcl or Java? I wish SafeTcl was isolated into a separate library
   with compiled-in safety so I could embed it into my applications. As it is
   now, I have to just use normal Tcl and hack in the MakeInterpreterSafe()
   function which removes dangerous commands.

   -Ray

You mean the "dangerous" commands can't just be left out of the proper
place in the makefile or something?

Phil

References:
- Re: Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel)
  - From: Ray Cromwell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: IPng6, SWIPE, ssh, etc.
Next by Date: Re: IPng6, SWIPE, ssh, etc.
Prev by thread: Re: Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel)
Next by thread: Re: Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread