[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)

To: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1995 21:05:31 EDT
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Aug 1995 20:00:00 EDT." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On a fair number of occassions I have been told that federal type folks
have made statements to the effect that there is no such thing as a "TOP
SECRET" classification of US government docs. Since really secret things
tend to get neither confirmed nor denied, I am inclined to believe this.
Thus SECRET is the top classification in today's government/military. If
anybody knows otherwise I would be interested in the information.

JWS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
  - From: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
  - From: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
Next by Date: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
Prev by thread: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
Next by thread: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread