[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "S1" encryption system
On Thu, 10 Aug 1995, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> It looks very much like the sort of typo you would get from a
> mistranslation from assembly language if the target architecture had a
> *4-bit* processor. (This is also consistant with the "<<4"'s which
> show up in several places in the code).
I'll back up the disassembly theory. I've done it myself once when I
lost some of my own source code from years previous and had to get out
the dissassembler. Very painful work which resulted in a first set of
source much like the "S1" sample posted here. Only difference was that I
went back over the "first draft" after verifying it and cleaned it up
somewhat.
The poster either does not know 'C' or thinks that a cleanup will reveal
his/her style.
- Andy
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Andrew Brown Internet <[email protected]> Telephone +44 115 952 0585 |
| PGP (2048/9611055D): 69 AA EF 72 80 7A 63 3A C0 1F 9F 66 64 02 4C 88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+