[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
YOM_ama
8-13-95. Sunday NYPaper:
"Bigger Than the Family, Smaller Than the State: Are
voluntary groups what make countries work?" [Book review]
Mr. Fukuyama has shifted his attention from the state to
society; the result is a fascinating and frustrating
book, "Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of
Prosperity." We have settled on the structure of the
state, he writes, but "liberal political and economic
institutions depend on a healthy and dynamic civil
society for their vitality."
In the world of ideas, civil society is hot. It is
almost impossible to read an article on foreign or
domestic politics without coming across some mention of
the concept. And "civil society" has bipartisan appeal;
from Hillary Rodham Clinton to Pat Buchanan, politicians
of all stripes routinely sing its praises.
Behind much of the new interest in civil society, on the
part of communitarians as well as social conservatives,
is the idea that culture and society shape the nature of
government. But the space between the realm of
government and that of the family can be filled with all
kinds of associations, liberal and illiberal. Historians
have amply laid out how the Nazi Party made its first
inroads through infiltrating local groups. On a less
extreme note, many of the small groups that have formed
in America over the last two decades have been
thoroughly illiberal in spirit: victims' groups that
have discouraged individual responsibility, minority
clubs that have Balkanized the campus and the workplace,
pseudoreligious cults with violent agendas. Not all of
civil society is civic minded.
A report on Timothy J. McVeigh's civil life noted that
Mr. McVeigh and Terry and James Nichols, would go
bowling and plan their future. But perhaps we would all
have been better off if Mr. McVeigh had gone bowling
alone.
YOM_ama (about 14K)