Re: A glance at the future of missing child identification

[Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello tibbs@sina.hpc.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III)
  and cypherpunks@toad.com
  and tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)

...[about transponders for humans]...
> Believe it or not, something like this is being used (or is being prepared
> for use) in breast implants.  An article in the Houston (silicone city)
...

Is this what they call topic drift?

> Subject: Re: A glance at the future of missing child identification

I can just see the parents getting their young daughters into this system.

Boys, of course, can look after themselves. Sure.
(Or do you envision young boys with breast implants?)


ObCrypto:

So, if they manage to make it more appropriate for both young girls and
for boys, are there any counterarguments? (Not for c'punks, for general
population: "missing children" will be hard to argue against.)

  * privacy (worth a try, anyhow)

  * use of the info by the bad guys (the mythical "pretty girl radar" :-)

  * "witness/victim protection" could be made harder by this

  * alternative: the transponder password could be shared secret between
the parents and the state (what combination here?); protects both against 
perverted state and perverted parents...


OK, what have I missed?

Jiri
- --
If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)
PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQCVAwUBMEV3+yxV6mvvBgf5AQEIZAP9HHwlBOjyAjY8v5sQhvHywAXFhiPUuiI2
iPqEyDJ+GB4ZepDJsgzLaroxcEf/Gh72bgi6K8rk3EpqdErDePXa21Egy9Fw9tkm
eFMY+YAOBLUO0C2thprTthVhlY194czoWuqvB2LXKwUyfV5w1CmvK0qQoO5+IVpL
ZUuCIsjKssw=
=qZnM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----