[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.

To: Jeff Barber <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
From: Scott Brickner <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:38:50 -0600
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: (Your message of Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:58:20 EST.) <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Jeff Barber writes:
>Does anyone know the ostensible justification for this?  What section of
>the ITARs do they point to when they say "this is illegal"?  I've perused
>an online copy of ITAR (no, I haven't read all of it -- I have other
>things I want to do this year :-), but I can't find a section that could
>be construed to support this contention.

I think it's 121.1, Category XIII paragraph (b) item (5):
"Ancillary equipment specifically designed or modified for paragraphs (b)
(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this category;"

References:
- Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
  - From: Jeff Barber <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Good Enough?
Next by Date: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
Prev by thread: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
Next by thread: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread