[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface

To: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
From: Aleph One <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 13:19:53 -0600 (CST)
Cc: Raph Levien <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Adam Shostack wrote:

> 	A daemon per user, or per machine?  Either way, I think you
> run into problems on a big multi-user machine.  (Either its an extra
> process or two per person, or its a great target for attack &
> subversion.

	Not any more are target for attack than a shared library.

Aleph One / [email protected]
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01

References:
- Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
  - From: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: ZD Net Update v.1 #2
Next by Date: Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
Prev by thread: Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
Next by thread: Re: Design proposal: crypto-capable generic interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread