[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e$: Come aaaannnndddd Get it!
From: IN%"[email protected]" "sameer" 16-NOV-1995 19:01:20.75
> I will as soon as someone comes up with a _fully_ private digital
> cash system and starts using it for something. As I understand it, Chaum's
> ecash system is not one (i.e., non-privacy to the sender and of amounts to the
> bank). If I'm incorrect, please tell me and I'll set up an account with MTB
> immediately (if there's a text-based interface).
ecash provides full payor anonymity. Payee anonymity is
currently not possible, but that is being worked on.
That's what I said; "non-privacy to the sender" is lack of payee
anonymnity. This lack is problematic for me personally in two respects:
First, there is that, as I have stated, I would like to be a payee at
some point. My likelihood of doing so is decreased if I do not have an
Second, services that I might like to utilize are less likely to be
available if the anonymnity of the provider is not guaranteed.