[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future will be easy to use
From: IN%"[email protected]" "Jon Lasser" 29-NOV-1995 16:23:00.41
Not if you're encrypting a Credit Card transaction to ship physical
goods. In that case, I'm going to certainly want to link a key ID to a
physical body (or at least address) if I'm the seller, so as to limit
liability as best I can.
While this might not ultimately be important, early adopters of crypto on
the net seem in general to be financially interested with an eye to limiting
liability. They want linked keys.
There's a public-relations aspect to crypto which most systems not
linking name -> key id fail. This is the step necessary to get it out
Unfortunately, it also appears counter to CP philosophy.
However, if you have optional linking of ID and name, shippers will only
ship to keys with such attributes. Because just ID and address, it could
be a "hit and run" type attack shipped to a safe maildrop.
If the transaction is via a Credit Card, it's the card issuer's
liability (and responsibility to determine creditworthiness), unless I'm badly
mistaken. If it's bank-issued ecash, then it's up to the bank to disgorge
physical dollars when ecash is presented to them. What's the risk in either