[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
Greg Broiles writes:
> But it seems to me that the real bottom line is that the information which
> is compelled is not incriminating, and the information which is
> incriminating is not compelled. The keys to my crypto might lead to
> incriminating evidence, or they might prove to be useful in a prosecution,
> but they're not in themselves any sort of a signal that a crime has been or
> will be committed.
Written half in jest: Well, the cries from the TLAs of "Why do you want to
use cryptography ? What do you have to hide ?" notwithstanding....
-Futplex <[email protected]>