[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IW Mailing List iw/951222 (fwd)
The following is forwarded from Risks [...s indicate missing regions of text]
> ---------------------------------------------
> FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
> ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy, Peter G. Neumann, moderator
> ...
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:59:09 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Naval Battleship takeover (Long, RISKS-17.55)
>
> A message from the InfoWar list noted that: <<There are NO active US
> battleships!!! And there weren't any last September.>>
>
> As stated, this is true. However, let the record show that the US Navy still
> flies the flag daily over 1 commissioned battleship, the USS Arizona,
> permanently stationed in Honolulu.
>
> ...
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 10:53:56 -0500
> From: Bob Brewin <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Naval Battleship takeover (Long, RISKS-17.55)
>
> Yikes. This story will not die -- it just lives on a Web site at the
> Daily Telegraph in London. Having worked for a British news
> organization (Reuters) for years, if you believe the Telly story, call
> me about a bridge I have for sale.
>
> The Air Force did not hack the Navy over the Internet. They did it over
> a secure network (SIPRNET) which is firewalled from the Internet.
>
> The Air Force conducted this attack with the Navy's knowledge and
> permission.
>
> The Navy does not have any battleships on active duty.
>
> The Air Force did not get control of the none-existent battleship.
>
> Yep. This does have the makings of a legend.
>
> Bob Brewin editor-at-large (whatever that means) federal computer week
> [email protected] [email protected]
> ...
-> See: Info-Sec Heaven at URL http://all.net/
Management Analytics - 216-686-0090 - PO Box 1480, Hudson, OH 44236