[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GAK_hit

To: John Young <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: GAK_hit
From: "James A. Donald" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1995 08:00:58 -0800
Sender: [email protected]

At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
>   12-4-95. W$Jabber:
>
>   "Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet.
>   Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled
>   Rival Software."

>      The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular
>      significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry
>      observers,


I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that 
this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GAK_hit
  - From: Jeff Weinstein <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
Next by Date: [[email protected]: IP: NSC Announce -- iPower home page/CryptoSampler announcement]
Prev by thread: GAK_hit
Next by thread: Re: GAK_hit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread