[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard

To: sameer <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 95 11:03:55 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 95 22:30:56 PST." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


>The chair of the working group seems interesting
>in including anonymous token-based payment systems in the standard, "I
>see no reason, other than interest, for the group to avoid
>non-account-based payment systems, to complement the account-based
>payment systems that we are now in the process of standardizing."

I see a damn good reason. X.9 is meant to be fast tracking credit card
payment mechanisms. They are not meant to be going out solving every problem in 
the universe. They could attempt to standardise non account payment systems 
after they have done the problem they were given. 

	Phill

References:
- the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
  - From: sameer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Escrow expectations
Next by Date: Key Escrow Agent Criteria [Draft]
Prev by thread: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
Next by thread: (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread