Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)

["Jeff Hupp" <jhupp@novellnet.gensys.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 10 Dec 95 at 12:30, Anonymous wrote:

: On  9 Dec 95 at 21:43, Jeff Hupp wrote:
: 
: > On  9 Dec 95 at 18:29, Siberia wrote:
: 
: > : Okay, here's how I understand things with PGP and Pegasus.
: > : You have two  options with Pegasus depending on the set-up
: > : options you choose.  You can either send upon completion of
: > : your out-going email, or you can have your mail queued
: > : until you press the send out-going mail button.  The actual
: > : PGP process does not occur until you actually send the
: > : mail.  So the answer would be: don't queue your mail.
: 
: > 	That's not really a solution in the Windows environment, if
: > you have a swap file, you never know what gets written out
: > to it.  The solution is run w/o a swap file or run an
: > encrypted file system.  I run an encrypted file system.
: 
: Oh, PLEASE! Do you HAVE to go and mix up two completely
: different issues? Aren't the nontechnical people trying to
: follow these things likely to be confused enough without your
: adding to that confusion? For every person who really 
: understands the technical issues there are probably a thousand 
: or ten thousand who are just trying to *use* the stuff without 
: stepping into a deep hole.
: 
: An OS swap file is one kind of hole.  What Siberia is writing 
: about is ANOTHER type of hole. If I wipe my swap file after 
: each use of my machine and don't know that Pegasus is doing 
: this, or think that because of what you wrote I'm no worse off, 
: I've been done a serious disservice.]

	So, I shouldn't take the opportunity to tell those non-technical people 
about the other "hole" they most likely have?  After all this only 
effects Windows users and it is a problem with windows.

	Read what I wrote, I did not say the original post was in error about 
not queuing mail and saw no reason to repeat what appears to be a fact. 
And, if the non technical people don't know about the swap file 
problem, and just assume that if they don't queue mail they are no 
worse off then they have been don a serious disservice.

	BTY, did you check it out?  Or just take what you saw as an 
opportunity to rant?

: 
: > 	Pegasus will indeed save your key with your message in the
: > outgoing queue.  This is a problem with the design of
: > pegasus, not with the design of the add on encryptor.  
: 
: How about saying something USEFUL, like yes or no to the
: question of whether sending WITHOUT queueing will make any
: difference? How about agreeing that if David Harris hopes to
: provide a useful interface to external "encryptors" he will
: have to do something about this?  How about cc'ing David?
: 
: Somebody else could as well point out that we're all full of 
: crap because we don't use Amigas, and while he might have a 
: point, it wouldn't be a very useful one.
: 

	Yes, it would have been a WONDERFUL opportunity to drop a O/S v. O/S 
troll on the list, notice I didn't.

	What I did do, was write up a problem description and mail it to David 
Harris.  This based on the likelyhood that he doesn't read cypherpunks.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMMrgqTUjeCeeebC9AQG3gwf/VdD9J/KJ1Tau3/L8BLoZ1v6ACAc93zcP
4F1MDoeX7EMSjWqGFZvsh0ev9hgciXvId9lu7tfMqIXQdolHzjXiyPXaw3qEa1Id
A80j+Z7OKB9RSz9LKHQqjrrqpANDbJ16LIztYW5r9YjMSntWX9OF7MzeZ0BJRYc4
d1oWnhHqnF6K9rX2XWDveXyQJgCnu2sZw6nNXi0V61OdhBc/QmPsjBp+u7aig+i8
vdC7EJh2znKsNqlQqiJmHnfTbGuoVZGQkc/71hpD2reLzcU7W/NQwM7rL4PFGyDg
QA15LXcfKsp6p0JCdZc+bvUfpH5mQQFWm4kd6sY7knjO3fKuTc7jpg==
=Li0A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
JHupp@gensys.com           |For PGP Public Key:
http://gensys.com          |finger jhupp@gensys.com
A generation which ignores history has no past - and no future.