[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: underground digital economy
On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, Alexander 'Sasha' Chislenko wrote:
> If you sell a new version of CryptoDoom for digicash, and would like to
> buy a car that is only sold for paper money, and I have a car to sell and
> want to buy your CryptoDoom, *somewhere* in the market there will appear
> an exchange agent that would help us complete the transaction. In the
> case of parallel digital currencies this exchange market would be very
> liquid because of the high speed, low cost, and security/privacy of the
> transactions.
This model isn't as practical as it seems. For one thing, it is a classic
case of barter: exchange for things that you want but don't have. This
becomes extremely difficult with specialization. Letsay I make only
CryptoDoom, its the only thing that I have the skills to make. The things
that I want but can't produce each day are numerous: food, transport,
housing, ad infinitum. One-to-one barter is only usefull if both agents
(in a 2 agent economy) need only 2 goods and specialize.
This is the root of money: a means of exchange between heterogenous
products. Allthough a parallel digital internetwork would allow
occasional barters to increase there viability, it does not mean that
barter will replace money. But there's some ambiguity here: What is
implied by "The case of parallel digital currencies this exchange market
would...."? Does this recomend exchange markets (barter) or fiat
(currency)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patiwat Panurach Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it.
eMAIL: [email protected] Boldness has genius, power and magic in it.
m/18 junior Fac of Economics -Johann W.Von Goethe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------