[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
From: Bruce Murphy <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 13:10:49 +0800
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jan 1996 12:11:12 PST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

In message <[email protected]>, 
  "Vladimir Z. Nuri" wrote:
> 
> has anyone *tried* just ignoring the ITAR wrt crypto and seeing what 
> would happen? the gubbermint blindly thinks that cyberspace will 
> inevitably bring the wrath of four horsemen of the infocalypse, but aren't we
> equally as comic in assuming that violating the ITAR crypto sections
> will inevitably bring the 4 horsemen of the NSA??

One word...

Zimmerman.

I do agree with what you're saying though.

--
Packrat (BSc/BE;COSO;Wombat Admin)
Nihil illegitemi carborvndvm.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
  - From: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <[email protected]>

References:
- more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
  - From: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Possible Java hack.
Next by Date: Re: PIDAHO and EUDORA PRO 2.2
Prev by thread: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
Next by thread: Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread