[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CP LITE: A Censorship Device?

To: Censored Girls Anonymous <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CP LITE: A Censorship Device?
From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:23:17 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Posted-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:23:19 -0500
Sender: [email protected]

On Sun, 28 Jan 1996, Censored Girls Anonymous wrote:

> I've been watching this CP Lite thing develop.

[...]

> There is just no way I will send someone an
> email to a posting they post out of there.

WOW!  Sign me up immediately!

> Love Always,
> 
> Carol Anne
> --

[...]

---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: [email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin
might have had to invent him."  in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information

References:
- CP LITE: A Censorship Device?
  - From: Censored Girls Anonymous <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Revisitting Blum-Macali "digital signatures"
Next by Date: pgp on linux
Prev by thread: CP LITE: A Censorship Device?
Next by thread: Re: CP LITE: A Censorship Device?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread