[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alleged RC2

To: Simon Spero <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Alleged RC2
From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:29:44 -0600
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960130101401.8758B-100000@chivalry>
References: <9601301402.AA15555@alpha><Pine.SOL.3.91.960130101401.8758B-100000@chivalry>
Sender: [email protected]



Any ideas on whether the comment in the source about the "effective
key length" trick being an export control deal is true?

If there were a known version of this floating around known to have a
40-bit restriction, is it likely that the restriction would be done by
always supplying "40" as the "bits" parameter, or would be it by
simply limiting the user key length?

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tivoli Systems * Austin TX   * I want more, I want more,
       [email protected] * [email protected]          * I want more, I want more ...
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         *_______________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alleged RC2
  - From: [email protected] (Mike Duvos)

References:
- Sad state of affairs
  - From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
- Re: Sad state of affairs
  - From: Simon Spero <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Sad state of affairs
Next by Date: Two bits, Four Bits, ETC
Prev by thread: Re: Sad state of affairs
Next by thread: Re: Alleged RC2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread