[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lotus Notes

To: Charlie_Kaufman/[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
From: [email protected] (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:00:24 -0800
Sender: [email protected]

At 11:09 1/30/96, Charlie_Kaufman/[email protected] wrote:

>p.s. re: the fact that it's 64 bits rather than 128. That was the limit on key
>size of the crypto software we licensed from a third party. That crypto
>software also limited us to 760 bit RSA keys.

I find this very interesting. RSA prohibits its licencees from using RSA
software with truly secure keylenghts. What may have incenitvised them to
take this bizzare position?

<Can't wait until these damm patents expire>

-- Lucky Green <mailto:[email protected]>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lotus Notes
  - From: Jeff Weinstein <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: FL Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Logins
Next by Date: Re: FV's Borenstein discovers keystroke capture programs! (
Prev by thread: Re: Lotus Notes
Next by thread: Re: Lotus Notes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread