[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PRIVACY: Private traces in public places
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: PRIVACY: Private traces in public places
- From: [email protected] (Anonymous)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:43:35 +0100
- Organization: RePLaY aND CoMPaNY UnLimited
- Sender: [email protected]
- Xcomm: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting
- Xcomm: Report misuse of this automated service to <[email protected]>
Responding to msg by [email protected] (Timothy C. May) on Wed, 10
Jan 0:9 AM
>I'm not trivializing the issue of search engines and
>archiving systems turning up articles written, old
>posts, etc. Every couple of weeks, sometimes more
>often, someone sends me a copy of one of my postings
>and claims that someone else must be forging my name
>(recent posts on racial issues, for example--while I'm
>not a racist, I despise quotas, setasides, and
>preferential treatment for lazy people, of any
>race...this obviously makes some people "ashamed for
>me" :-}).
http://nytsyn.com/live/News3/006_010696_101827_2723.html
Last summer the first case in Britain of a libel on the
Internet was
settled out of court when Laurence Godfrey accepted
undisclosed
damages from another nuclear physicist, Philip Hallam-Baker,
over
remarks made in 1993 on Usenet, an electronic conference
with 16
million users. And Peter Lilley, the Social Security
Secretary, sent a
stiff letter to the vice-chancellor of Leeds University
after one of
its students used a faculty computer to make defamatory
allegations
about him.