[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)

Subject: Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
From: Rich Graves <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 02:04:13 -0800
Apparently-To: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960110182255.18692H-100000@xdm011>
Newsgroups: netcraft.cypherpunks,alt.security.pgp,sci.crypt,mail.cypherpunks
Organization: Stanford University
References: <[email protected]> <Pine.ULT.3.91.960110182255.18692H-100000@xdm011>
Sender: [email protected]
Xref: hudson.lm.com alt.security.pgp:49449 sci.crypt:47979 mail.cypherpunks:24302

An easy short-term partial solution would be to modify mailcrypt, bap, or
whatever front end you use to automatically put the current date and (a
shortened form of) the To: or Newsgroups: header into the PGP signature
Comments: line. 

-rich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  - From: Guy Geens <[email protected]>
- Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  - From: David Mazieres <[email protected]>
- Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  - From: [email protected] (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)

References:
- Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  - From: Jeffrey Goldberg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Cybersloth
Next by Date: Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
Prev by thread: Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
Next by thread: Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread