Remailers and Me

[Bruce Baugh <bruceab@teleport.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This may sound like a clueless newbie question, but then it pretty much
_is_, redeemed only by the fact that I know it. :-)

Following a lead provided by another local newbie, I've been doing a bunch
of amateur remailer testing, looping messages from here through a given
remailer to a nym server, back through the remailer, to here, and toting up
the travel times.

The latency and reliability figures I'm getting bear little or no
resemblance to the info included with Private Idaho, discussed here, and
like that.

Question: is this anything to be concerned about? I'm assuming that the
folks doing ping testing are throwing far more clueful and automated
procedures at the problem, just for starters. But then I get the impression
that their methodology differs from what I'm doing here, too. (My aim was to
simulate "normal" use, at least for me, and to go on to test times through
combos of the most reliable sites later.)

Bruce "One ringy-dingy, two ringy-dingy" Baugh
bruceab@teleport.com
http://www.teleport.com/~bruceab

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEQAwUBMP2cxH3AXR8sjiylAQF0dgfRAZ1Mm6OxLhIQmcWA/gli96RVsZWnODLw
HV5eUF8llVVL+XIzl7wuY9u9uiDdbi13mgWYx2PReYYoRZ6cGqCOMmqYyoCCS0Mr
drUckoohuERMMi6Yh8V9rHVLSdK49BXril8E/lQo7TxxwRyVASINrh7B22B6Ka1o
Ymd+kkjah2WkL0oE+qnNoMylhUc5WYbKaO5BskP91zmV6S4MTHinKDOs8EPGEM1H
ZzNBLXJk0C/kYwxTIaqq7I70BzYkSEPqXaT/2LMjzCvuz20pMN5jGGof6EmAQi3B
R2wbVKp9A8SmBtFHah+HkROFqulSzLKxglGkPKVGFIVK0Ao=
=JsYr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Bruce Baugh
bruceab@teleport.com
http://www.teleport.com/~bruceab