[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Nations see Internet.." continued
On Sun, 4 Feb 1996, Mike Ang wrote:
>
> Comparing crypto to guns works in the sense that the "bad guys" will
> always be able to have access to them. However, I for one support gun
> control but do not support mandatory limits on crypto. Where I live,
> there are no theats that justify allowing everyone to carry guns
>
well, I'll tell you what, we'll export 10,000 of our inner city
gang members north; then you think about leaving _all_ weapons in
the hands of the central state who increasingly is failing to provide
adequate protection for the weak members of its society.
>- the
> threat to privacy and freedom of speech justifies allowing everyone to
> use strong crypto. You can use a gun to deprive another person of their
> life - what harm can you do another with PGP? Perhaps you can harm them
> by being able to spread hate propaganda, but I don't think that that is a
> strong enough argument.
>
> - Mike.
>
> If you've got to flame me, do it by email.
>
__________________________________________________________________________
go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
_________________________________________________________________ attila__
To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
There is no safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be.