[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FV's blatant double standards

To: "Simson L. Garfinkel" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: FV's blatant double standards
From: John Pettitt <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 18:00:35 -0800
Sender: [email protected]

At 08:39 PM 2/5/96 -0500, Simson L. Garfinkel wrote:
>Yes, clearly if you are not concerned about missing 50-75% of First Virtual's 
>users, this attack will work just fine.
>-simson
>
>
Who cares - if 25 to 50% of a systems users are
vulnderable doesn't that make it weak ?

John Pettitt, [email protected]
VP Engineering, CyberSource Corporation, 415 473 3065
 "Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that man
  doesn't have to experience it." - Max Frisch

Prev by Date: RC2 question [No Nuke Content]
Next by Date: Re: [noise] Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
Prev by thread: Re: FV's blatant double standards
Next by thread: Re: FV's blatant double standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread