Re: "PGP-Scape"? (was Re: Our "New Order")

[Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

cp@proust.suba.com (Alex Strasheim) wrote:
>> There's also less worry about secure transactions, since if 
>> everything's encrypted it's harder to tell if a transaction is taking 
>> place, viewing porno or subversive or religious, literature,  or if
>> you're just reading something mundane.
>
>I think I must be missing something here.  Aren't you describing an SSL 
>web server?  Different algorithms, but basically the same idea?

No. SSL doesn't encrypt everything, just certain transactions (or am I 
wrong about this?)  Something that keeps everything encrypted and 
anonymous.

>Netscape 2.0 is out for real -- everyone can now pick their certs.  GAK 
>just got harder.

As opposed to the imaginary beta?



- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMRcCsyoZzwIn1bdtAQEZYAF6Aql41weD0Dz+7aQbQ+OFyXeb8fPgoO9n
o/muL79oNXntntKcqmaqSHWsxz/VuTX1
=69yF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----