[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: POTP gets good press

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: POTP gets good press
From: Simon Spero <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 7 Feb 1996, Bryce wrote:

[original messsage]
> I, Bryce, wrote:
> ...
> > certificate authority which transmits them to multiple
> ...
[reply to my reply] 
> But this would entail a certificate authority to prevent
> MITM attack, right?  The article clearly claimed that POTP

I guess I ought to try and find the article; I took this line in your 
message to suggest that there was such a CA. Could you possibly type in 
the relevant bit of the original article (though I suspect there's not 
much in there anyway)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POTP gets good press
  - From: Bryce <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: POTP gets good press
  - From: Bryce <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?
Next by Date: Re: POTP gets good press
Prev by thread: Re: POTP gets good press
Next by thread: Re: POTP gets good press
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread