[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
At 06:03 AM 2/13/96 GMT, John Lull wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:41:04 -0500 (EST), Padgett wrote:
>
>> If it were properly and legally decided that communications
>> with anon.penet.fi is against "national interest" then the sovereign has
>> not only the "right" but the *duty* to block/monitor such communications.
>
>Bullpuckey. One could just as legitimately say:
>
> "If it were properly and legally decided that publication of the
> Los Angeles Times is against "national interest" then the sovereign
> has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block such publication."
"Right on", as they used to say. Padgett's clueless. He'll try to justify
ANYTHING.