Re: The Internet Party

[Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@UNiX.asb.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Brian D Williams wrote:
[..]
> <bright idea!>Looks pretty dim to me.
 
> Say, why not pick our own candidate?
> Why not form our own Party?
> The Internet party........
> It would be the ultimate write in campaign.
> Now all we need is a candidate who stands for free speech, personal
> privacy and the right to encrypt.......Just as bad as people who vote for ONE issue like abortion or civil 
rights or NAFTA/GATT and ignore everything else.  These are important 
issues, but they aren't the only ones.  And any support from netters will 
fall after arguing about everything else.

...and the sad thing is you might well shoot yourself in the foot for 
voting against somebody over one or two issues.  I know people who'd vote 
for anybody but Clinton.  They babble about Clinton being a "socialist" 
<chuckle> so much that they'd end up voting for a National Socialist <not 
funny either...!>

> "I nominate John Perry Barlow. Who will second the nomination?"I nominate Frank Zappa. The music's better and dead presidents don't cost 
as much to maintain.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMSKSfyoZzwIn1bdtAQEr7gF/enFcC7CX8islsCHJ9BHdWa3SAvmvxlZh
Nd39qds0s0D5gjRcEoKTu9wiHCmIOqaU
=aKJh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----