[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
From: Sten Drescher <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 13:57:14 -0600
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: [email protected]'s message of Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:27:56 -0800
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

[email protected] said:

j> 1.  President Clinton declared CDA unconstitutional and directed
j> the Justice department to refrain from enforcing it.

	Then why is the Justice Department defending it?  Sorry, but
unless you can give us a citation, I can't buy this one.  I believe
that Clinton did, however, direct the Justice Department to not
enforce the abortion gag rule that got tacked on at the very end, so
maybe that's what you are thinking of.  But that wasn't part of the
CDA.

-- 
#include <disclaimer.h>                               /* Sten Drescher */
Unsolicited email advertisements will be proofread for a US$100/page fee.

References:
- Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96)
Next by Date: Re: The Internet Party
Prev by thread: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
Next by thread: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread