[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)

To: "Deranged Mutant" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
From: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:42:43 EST
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:11:36 GMT." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> I would have thought you and Colin would have some communication with 
> Phil regarding PGP3, since PGP is his trademark.

Colin and I have been speaking to Phil.  That doesn't mean that I have
any idea what ViaCrypt is doing.  Perhaps Phil and ViaCrypt should
talk?  If there is a problem with ViaCrypt 4.0, it is between Phil and
ViaCrypt.

> The web page referred to it as being in beta, so maybe they are 
> working with the old specs... could also be that they completely 
> rewrote and improved on the old version.

I have nothing to do with ViaCrypt.  I dont know anything about their
products.  I don't know what they have or plan to have in their 4.0
version.  I dont know what spec they are using.  I dont know what new
data structures they have created.

-derek

References:
- Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
  - From: "Deranged Mutant" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Using PGP for pseudo random numbers?
Next by Date: Re: PGP backdoor? (No, I'm not paranoid.)
Prev by thread: Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
Next by thread: Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread