Re: [Political Rant] Was: examples of mandatory content rating?

[Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>]

On Sat, 13 Apr 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:


> And like any ratings system, it relies on the raters subjective 
> judgement.  Not a very market stable or market wise system.  Tell me who 

	Since somebody else brought up SurfWatch, remember that 
	it was SurfWatch that declared whitehouse.org to be 
	off-limits for obscene content.  A mistake on their
	part --- or at least that is their claim.  << This
	was just before CDA passed, btw.   >> << I personally
	thought it was a great way to demonstrate the absurdity 
	of CDA.  >>

        xan

        jonathon
        grafolog@netcom.com



**********************************************************************
*								     *
*	Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views.   *
*								     *
*	There is no way that they can be construed to represent      *
*	any organization's views.				     *
*								     *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*	ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html	     *
*								     *
***********************************************************************