[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ApacheSSL

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ApacheSSL
From: Jeff Weinstein <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 14:46:02 -0700
CC: [email protected]
Organization: Netscape Communications Corp.
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Sean A. Walberg wrote:
> 
> An ISP that I have ties with  is looking to set up a secure server.
> Currently, they are running Apache.  I told them that for ~$500 they
> can put on Apache SSL and be all ready.  However, they want to buy
> Netscape (for the name, I've already given them the 40bit gospel),
> put it on a separate, firewalled machine, allow no access to it, etc,
> etc.  Is all this paranoia necessary?

  I won't argue about the merits of Apache vs. Netscape servers.
However I will point out that if your ISP friend is in Canada, they
can get the 128-bit version of the Netscape server.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
[email protected] - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.

References:
- ApacheSSL
  - From: "Sean A. Walberg" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Was the clause for Biometric ID Cards dropped?
Next by Date: Re: OS/2 encryption
Prev by thread: ApacheSSL
Next by thread: Re: ApacheSSL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread