[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues

To: [email protected], [email protected] (Timothy C. May), [email protected]
Subject: Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
From: jim bell <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:42:29 -0800
Sender: [email protected]

At 07:07 AM 4/24/96 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>At 11:45 PM 4/23/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>> And so the back-and-forth continues...taking up even more list space
>> arguing, waffling, finessing, rebutting, disputing, and on an on.
>>
>> Exactly as several of us have predicted.
>
>True, but one should note that it is Jim Bell that is weaseling,
>and that Unicorn is not weaseling.

Who says?  Unicorn started by making an unbelievable challenge (especially 
given the fact that he, unlike I, is anonymous) and THEN he claimed that he 
didn't believe we'd ever agree to terms, etc.

This sounds like weaseling to me.  Let Unicorn FIRST identify himself.  Then 
we'll see who's "weaseling."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
  - From: Sandy Sandfort <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [Yadda Yadda :-)] Re: Rabbi Hier Testimony
Next by Date: [Yadda Yadda :-)] Re: Militias, reputation capital, unfounded , rumor-mongering, and the DNS
Prev by thread: Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
Next by thread: Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread