[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Yadda Yadda] Poker (was Re: [NOISE] [Wager: Seeming Resolution])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <[email protected]>,
jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> What "kill"? Unicorn claimed a few days ago that he THOUGHT that his
> challenge would never be accepted, ostensibly because of haggling by me. I
> interpret this as unwillingness to bargain in good faith (sandbagging),
> which is reasonable given Unicorn's track record. Given this thinly-veiled
> warning of dishonesty, it is only realistic that I would not want to accept
> his challenge.
Jim Bell's ignorance apparently knows no boundaries. That's not what
"sandbagging" means.
In poker, to sandbag is to raise a bet after having opened that betting
round by checking. It's frowned upon in some poker games, but completely
acceptable in others - check the house rules before trying it.
Try as I might, I can't see how Black Unicorn's statements qualify as
sandbagging. He certainly didn't open the betting by checking!
- --
Alan Bostick | They say in online country there is no middle way
mailto:[email protected] | You'll either be a Usenet man or a thug for the CDA
news:alt.grelb | Simon Spero (after Tom Glazer)
http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~abostick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQB1AwUBMX8PwuVevBgtmhnpAQHf3wL/VWAPk8uF8p9hsUKp9q6OLd8TpRKN4N0Y
aE3t2ECHB1unfjtSAeQxF1PeGhJdv53XWvcRyS44dgHNaylovpbJSXN3IEUg0GeT
9JyaieZ02EHBlHeNrUjCWTNfJAtSLVdX
=AGof
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----