[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: misunderstandings of PICS
At 04:40 PM 5/6/96 EDT, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> In other words, the CyberAngels want to eliminate any pages that
>contain material they think minors shouldn't see that aren't self-rated with
>a PICS self-rating (the first of the three types) intended to block minors
>from seeing it. Yes, this is an abuse of the market oriented variety of PICS;
>they obviously don't know and/or don't care. If you want to convince them
>otherwise, start cc:ing your messages (and forwarding mine, on this I give you
>permission) on PICS and the CyberAngels to [email protected].
I didn't see the cyberangel proposal, but how is this an abuse?
Regardless, it's a waste of time, browsers will have the option of "If not
PICS labled, don't return." They're better off advising people to flip that
switch if this is such a big concern.
_______________________
Regards, Men govern nothing with more difficulty than their tongues,
and can moderate their desires more than their words. -Spinoza
Joseph Reagle http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
[email protected] E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65 BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E